π Full paper accepted at the 21st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2026): “From Legal Text to Executable Decision Models: Evaluating Structured Representations for Legal Decision Model Generation”
**Update 10 Jun 2026: I presented this paper at ICAIL 2026, see my slides here.**
Get the preprint, here:
-
D. Graus, “From Legal Text to Executable Decision Models: Evaluating Structured Representations for Legal Decision Model Generation,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL), Singapore, 2026.
[Bibtex]@inproceedings{graus2026legaltext, author = {Graus, David}, title = {{From Legal Text to Executable Decision Models: Evaluating Structured Representations for Legal Decision Model Generation}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL)}}, year = {2026}, month = jun, address = {Singapore}, publisher = {ACM}, note = {To appear}, }
This paper studies LLMs and representation for generating executable decision models from legal text, using the Dutch Environment and Planning Portal (Digitaal Stelsel Omgevingswet (DSO)) as a case study, as it pairs complex hand-crafted decision models with legal articles. There’s 2 main findings!
1οΈβ£ We* find that providing input & output specifications (i.e., what variables a citizen must provide, and what the legal outcomes may be) improve LLM performance over raw legal text or text enriched with semantic role labels.
2οΈβ£ Interestingly, when evaluating generated models’ structural similarity to ground truth (do the models look similar?), and outcome similarity (do they yield the same legal outcomes?) we find complementarity: generated models can score well on structure while missing legal nuance, or vice versa. π€ More interestingly, we find that some models are structurally very dissimilar, and mostly much smaller/simpler, while yielding 100% identical legal outcomes! See attached pic for an example: the generated decision model yields 100% identical outcomes while completely ignoring 2 out of 4 input variables!
π We release the full dataset of 95 production-grade decision models and their associated legal text, for reproducibility and extension of this work. It really is a pretty cool dataset!
Stay tuned for the preprint! See you in πΈπ¬ Singapore, where we’ll also host the 1st AI & Open Government (AIOG) Workshop!
* when I say “we”, I actually mean “I” but it sounds weird — this is a single author paper; but I have to thank Anne Schuth and Damiaan Reijnaers for feedback, help, and inspiration!
